|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What does a balanced scorecard look like? An example scorecard for an injection molding department is shown below. In this example, the red figure in each column corresponds to the actual performance that the workgroup realized during the most recent month. In the case of safety, this workgroup chose to make it an "all or nothing" scoring process - any number of lost time accidents in the month would cause them to lose all of their points for the Safety performance area.
Also note in this example that while the Quality performance area has a weight of '4' relative to the others (Safety appears to be the most important), it actually carries a total weight of '8' because there are two quality measures, and only one measure for each of the other performance areas. In this example, the workgroup earned 146 points for the month, or 58% of the total points possible (250). Would You Like to Learn More? Click on one of the following links to learn even more about Great Systems! and the types of systems improvements I can help you make:
“The only thing I know is that I do not know it all.” -- Socrates |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||